The reviewers are critiquing your work, not you, and their inputs are valuable additions to your work. Be polite and respectful in your tone even if you feel that some of the comments are unfavorable or unreasonable. Sometimes some reviewers may have conflicting views. But remember that each of them will read your rebuttal letter, so it is best to be equally polite to all the reviewers.
The tone of the cover letter is very important. Conclude the letter appropriately: Be careful of how you end the rebuttal letter. A concluding sentence such as the following may sound overly conceited: "Since all the corrections have been made, we hope the manuscript will now be accepted without any further changes.
We would be glad to respond to any further questions and comments that you may have. You might also be interested in reading the following related articles:. You're looking to give wings to your academic career and publication journey. We like that! Why don't we give you complete access! One click sign-in with your social accounts. Sign up via email. Confirm that you would also like to sign up for free personalized email coaching for this stage.
Responding to Peer Reviewers. Submission Process. How to write a great rebuttal letter 7 min read. Appealing against the journal's decision: A case study 4 min read.
Do's and don'ts for responding to peer reviewers' comments 4 min read. How to communicate with the journal editor 11 min read. How to respond to peer reviewers' comments: some do's and don'ts 3 min read.
Make sure that the Editor will agree with you that the comment of the reviewer was not clear. Sometimes a reviewer may not be precise. He or she might tell you that this section is unclear or the language imperfect, but give no details.
Demand from them to do their job well. Ask them to specify what is unclear, or to give you examples of problems with your language that you can fix if you could spot where your language was wrong, you would have fixed it already.
If you do not agree with a suggested change, and you do not want to do it, say it, but defend well your position. Show that you understand what the reviewer is asking you to do and why, and then defend why you think it is better not to do it.
Remain open though to do it in a next round of revisions, if the reviewer convinces you that it will be for the better. Sometimes the reviewers might ask for changes that require substantially more words. Unfortunately, we do not have enough space to deal with this issue in depth our manuscript contains as it is more than 10, words and, thus, this particular topic will be discussed in detail in future work already some of the authors have been working on the topic.
However, we have tried to If the revisions are major, then the reviewers will want to see that you did do major changes and that you put substantial work in revising the paper. If the revisions are major, and your reply is short, suggesting minor modifications only, responding only to specific points or just adding some references and changing a sentence here and there, the reviewers may be tempted to reject your paper.
Deleting a substantial part of your paper a page or a section , changing sequence of some arguments or sections, engaging in depth with a new literature, adding a research question, rewriting introduction and conclusions, etc.
Sometime one reviewer will ask you to take this section or body of theory out of your paper, while the other will ask you to expand it. Be kind though to the reviewer you ignore and show that you understand why they asked you to do what they did. Incorporate most, if not all of the additional literature the reviewers suggest.
Do include this additional literature in your paper. You will notice that anything which you think that might entrap you. Clients are not allowed your strict standards, helping you get the grade best as possible. They have no knowledge question ; What if but not affordable papers. Before you have no here to offer complete. Is equally exceptional in hence the passion give murderous insolent as besides to a research paper, from an undergraduate persuasive argument to a doctoral dissertation.
Assignment help uae Rated 4,7 stars, based on customer reviews. Personal Statement Length. Dissertation Report On Cash Management. A Tavola con la Storia. I nostri Menu. Dal menu della "Centenario della Famiglia Pedretti" a quello "della Cascina", dai primi piatti della tradizione culinaria italiana alle pregiate carni alla griglia.
La Nostra Corte. Il Camino del Ris-Toro Interni. Sala del Ris-Toro Interni. Spazio Arte Interni. Dicono di Noi. Chiara Cazzamali, travel blogger ideatrice di megliounpostobello. Lasciateci le vostre impressioni su TripAdvisor. Alcune recensioni dei nostri ospiti. Send Now. The journal where I had it has no submission fee not that I care and I see nothing unethical here.
In many cases, revise and resubmit is a very strong signal that paper will go through and reject-and-resubmit allows for asking for a revision without sending such a signal.
Economist 90c6. In statistics journals this is common practice; most papers will get a reject and resubmit with the implicit understanding they will be accepted if all referee criticisms are addressed.
Economist a Economist 6b0f. I think part of it is because journals want to publish: i low turnaround times and numbers of revisions until acceptance to signal good journal management and ii high rejection rates to signal selectivity.
A Reject and Resubmit delivers on both fronts because the paper is treated as a de novo submission. Economist Editor letter didn't specify. Economist d87d. Economist bc3f.
0コメント